top of page

All Posts

Words have always been weapons in the arsenal of power. They've been used to divide us, to diminish others, to reshape our reality in ways that serve those at the top. But here's what makes this moment different: we're starting to see it happen in real time.


Current case in point, DEI. We allowed those who want to preserve their advantages and create divisions in society to subtly persuade ordinary Americans that language like "privilege" is a dismissal of their own struggles. To oligarchs like Musk and Trump who leverage their inherited wealth to power, DEI means “Didn’t Earn It,” which is as laughable as it is damaging. It’s an illustration of how language shapes how we think. Yes, I know what I wrote. It's not only the other way around.

 

Lera Boroditsky talks about language shaping our perception. She shares an incredible story about the aboriginal Kuuk Thaayorre people in Australia, whose language and world view are framed by the cardinal directions. Robin Wall Kimmerer writes about Native American languages where nouns are only used to describe dead things - that the translation for tree" is "it is being a tree.” Imagine how we'd treat our environment if we viewed it as something other than an object, a commodity.

 

When we talk about "slaves" instead of "enslaved people," we're reducing human beings to nothing more than their forced condition. We're erasing their humanity. We do the same thing when we use "disabled" as a noun. The genocide of Native American peoples began with language, and erasing their languages was a pillar of the cultural genocide we perpetrated for generations. It's working brilliantly in the case of calling asylum seekers "illegals." That single word transforms people like us, seeking safety, into criminals in our minds.

 

To further distract us from the actual implications of Jim Crow and the more painful parts of our shared history, racist forces in the GOP manufactured a threat associated with critical race theory, an obscure term in academia that has absolutely no bearing on our ordinary lives. But we need to know our history to understand why equity matters - look up redlining, Wilmington, NC, the Tulsa Massacre, or Roberts Moses.

 

Maybe the fight for justice, for environmental protection, for human dignity – for democracy itself - is tied to language. When we lose the words to describe injustice, we lose our ability to fight against it. When we lose the language that helps us see the natural world as living and dynamic, we lose our connection to it. When we perceive people as their status or station, we are less likely to be moved to compassion – or action – when they are threatened.

 

As we allow the powerful to shape our language, so do we allow them to shape our views. It's insidious. And dangerous. And we must resist.

 

 

Learn More:

 

Tearing Down Black America, The Boston Review

 

Robin Wall Kimmerer Wants to Extend the Grammar of Animacy, Science Friday

 

Cultural Assimilation of Native Americans, Human Rights Pulse

 

How languages shape the way we think: TED

 

The demonization of journalists and erosion of public trust in the press has reached alarming levels. Politicians, propagandists, and platforms calling themselves "news" have waged a relentless campaign to undermine the credibility of traditional news sources. This coordinated effort has exploited the public's growing skepticism towards institutions, capitalizing on the polarized political climate to paint journalists as enemies of the people rather than essential watchdogs of democracy.


Media's Role in Underminig Public Trust

Traditional media hasn't helped itself, either. In the battle for viewers and ad dollars, many outlets have compromised their journalistic integrity. They've embraced sensationalism, blurred the lines between news and opinion, and prioritized speed over accuracy. Maybe it's financially inevitable, with the pressures of the 24 news cycle, and the fact that broadcast and cable news operate under different rules.


Misinformation: The Weapon Against Democracy

This race to the bottom has eroded public trust and played into the hands of those seeking to discredit legitimate journalism.


This shift has made it easier for critics to dismiss unfavorable coverage as biased, regardless of its factual basis. As a result, the media landscape has become increasingly fragmented, with audiences retreating to echo chambers that reinforce their existing beliefs. Viewers, listeners and readers seem to have less tolerance for diverse perspectives and rigorous reporting.


Crumbling Foundation of Facts

The consequences of this assault on journalistic integrity are far-reaching and IMHO, frightening. Americans have lost our shared foundation of facts, making it virtually impossible to engage in meaningful dialogue across ideological divides. This has created fertile ground for misinformation and conspiracy theories. Misinformation - and simply wild, reckless lies from public figures - have (may I suggest, deliberately) eroded the public's ability to discern truth from fiction. The result is a dangerous cycle that threatens the very foundations of our democratic society, as an uninformed (or misinformed) public becomes more susceptible to manipulation by those who seek to consolidate power at the expense of truth.


Joining the Battle for Truth

We're not helpless. We can combat the erosion of trust in journalism and protect our democratic foundations. We can:

  1. Support quality journalism financially by subscribing to reputable news outlets and donating to non-profit news organizations.

  2. Develop media literacy skills and encourage others to do the same. Learn to critically evaluate news sources, fact-check information, and recognize bias.

  3. Engage with diverse news sources to broaden our perspectives and challenge our own biases.

  4. Encourage and participate in civil discourse, especially with those who hold different views.

  5. Demand transparency from politicians and hold them accountable for spreading misinformation.

  6. Support educational initiatives that teach critical thinking and media literacy.


Further Reading:

  • Jan 19
  • 2 min read

During the 2024 campaign cycle I found myself seeking Twitter - I mean "X" - alternatives, with BlueSky Social emerging as my home of choice. Twitter is Dead. Long Live BlueSky!


What was once a vibrant "town square" since Elon Musk's acquisition in 2022 has, for me, devolved into a cesspool rife with unchecked toxicity. The removal of robust content moderation and fact-checking mechanisms has led to an influx of extremist propaganda, violent video clips, and demonstrably false information from influencers appearing in my "For You" feed. It's been hard to leave Twitter, but Twitter left me two years ago.


This shift hasn't just affected user experience; it's had significant financial implications. Recent data suggests that X's revenue has plummeted, with U.S. earnings in Q2 2024 showing a 53% decline from the previous year. The platform's struggle to maintain advertiser relationships and boost subscription numbers has left its financial future uncertain -- hooray for economic justice.


The Rise of BlueSky Social

In response to these changes, I have joined the people I followed on Twitter who migrated to BlueSky Social. This platform offers a refreshing return to a more curated news feed experience, reminiscent of Twitter's earlier days. However, it's not quite the same. The mobile experience needs tweaking, I'm struggling to rebuild with independent journalists, and I'm beginning to encounter trolls. I suppose like germs, they are everywhere.


The Broader Implications

The current state of social media raises alarming questions about the future of online communities and conversations. Sarah Gancher's play "Russian Troll Farm," presented as a workplace comedy, now serves as a chilling reflection of our reality. It underscores the profound impact of disinformation on an unprepared population. Like smallpox. Or polio. The announcement that Facebook will also scale back its fact-checking efforts is another disappointing turn. As major platforms retreat from content verification, it's harder to pretend we're not living in a post-truth era.


Looking Forward

Can we agree to stay vigilant, discerning consumers of information? While platforms like BlueSky offer a temporary respite, the broader issues of the normaization of misinformation and the need for responsible content moderation remain with us. The financial struggles of X may not matter to Musk, as long as he has a tool to warp the perceptions of the masses. That makes our role as social media users increasingly important. Together we can seek out and amplify reliable sources, support platforms that prioritize truth and user safety, and demand accountability from social media companies. The journey from Twitter to BlueSky is just one step in the resistance.


Further Reading


Stay Connected with Us

Thanks for submitting!

bottom of page